I'd like to have an argument . . . .
Several issues arose from the results – some bemusing, some disquieting and some merely inconvenient.
Despite my recently displayed ability with PhotoShop, I was not identified most with Terry Gilliam.
However, in a twist which should delight Cherrypie’s taste in celebrity dinner party guests, I was most closely identified with Graham Chapman – not necessarily a bad thing, although our recreational tastes differed somewhat.
The predictor, however, indicated that I was more likely to be like Carol Cleveland than Eric Idle or Michael Palin.
Terry Gilliam, however, was the second most likely of the troupe to parallel my tastes and sociopathic tendencies. This is a relief, since I did enjoy “12 Monkeys” and “The Adventures of Baron Munchausen.” “Brazil” was also enjoyable, although I didn’t get to see “The Fisher King” or “The Brothers Grimm.”
9 Comments:
I'm confused. A natural state of affairs for me, I'm afraid.
The bad thing about being Graham Chapman is ... he's dead. The Fisher King was better than Brazil or Baron Munchausen.
The good thing about being Graham Chapman is . . . e's not dead. E's resting.
This is Monty Python we're talking about Pam. confusion is your best defense!
Which is why I wield my confusion with such aplomb!
I'm not dead yet!
Shut up, you will be!
Was tonight's cod joke really that bad?
I predicted Gilliam and I predicted right although I wanted to be Palin (least likely). Disturbingly, I was second most likely to be Carol Cleveland.
I hope this isn't a sign, Richard, that we're candidates for reassignment surgery.
The cod joke was very funny.
Post a Comment
<< Home